How can the position of the president’s antiwar critics be best characterized?

The position of the president’s antiwar critics can be characterized as viewing the conflict primarily as a civil war between factions in Vietnam. This perspective emphasizes that the hostilities in Vietnam were rooted in internal political struggles, rather than being solely a battleground in the broader context of the Cold War. Critics believed that framing the conflict as a fight against communism oversimplified the complexities of Vietnam's political landscape and ignored the distinct goals of the Vietnamese nationalists and communists.

By seeing it as a civil war, critics argued that U.S. involvement only escalated violence and suffering, perpetuating a cycle that could lead to further instability in the region. This understanding would, therefore, advocate for a reevaluation of U.S. policy, calling for withdrawal instead of direct military engagement, which they felt contributed to rather than helped resolve the conflict. Their focus on the internal dynamics of Vietnam highlighted their stance that the solution lay in Vietnamese autonomy rather than foreign intervention.