Which of the following would most likely indicate that the government was perceived as antagonistic toward the common people?

Prepare for the AMSCO APUSH exam with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations. Study effectively and ace your AP U.S. History exam!

The Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC), established in 1932 during the Great Depression, was designed to provide financial support to banks, railroads, and other large businesses in order to stabilize the economy. However, many people perceived this approach as failing to directly address the needs of the common citizens who were suffering the most during this crisis. Critics of the RFC argued that by prioritizing aid to large corporations over direct support for individuals and smaller businesses, the government was more concerned about maintaining the stability of financial institutions than about the welfare of ordinary Americans. This led to a perception that the government was not only indifferent but potentially antagonistic toward the common people's struggles, as it seemed to favor the wealthy and businesses at the expense of widespread relief efforts needed by the average citizen.

In contrast, the other options—such as the Social Security Act, public works programs, and increased funding for vocational training—were initiatives aimed directly at aiding individuals and communities, reflecting a supportive government response to the needs of the common people. Each of these actions is generally seen as a proactive effort to provide stability and security, which contrasts with the RFC's focus on large corporate interests.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy